Skip to main content

The Myth of the Soul Mate

Yesterday, this conversation began on Facebook.

You can read the article here.

I started to respond, but then it was getting too long for a Facebook post. And I wanted to bring you all into the conversation. So here are my thoughts:

a. Jessica... (I shake my head)

b. I pretty much agree that our generation expects deep and meaningful relationships to happen spontaneously/up front/without the hard work. Despite dating a super cute rock star, I don't think there is such a thing as a "soul mate" - or that there is only ONE "soul mate," the ONLY person to marry.

My current philosophy on dating/marriage (subject to change without notice) is that the four crucial ingredients are:
  1. a growing relationship with Jesus (applicable for Christians - the non-religious equivalent would be a common worldview, I think)
  2. mutual commitment (you have to both want this and be willing to work at it)
  3. chemistry (this includes a base of friendship & that ineffable quality of attraction that can't be forced or feigned, no matter how hard you try)
  4. clear communication (if you're not able to be honest with each other, I think you're doomed)
Beyond these things, the rest are details. Obviously that's a slight generalization. What I mean is perhaps that this is the foundation from which you work out all the other things.

So. Am I crazy? What's your philosophy on dating/marriage/soul mates?

Comments

  1. Ariana2:30 AM

    That sounds like about what I think. ...Or what I think I think. Or what I want to think?

    At any rate, I believe it, whether or not I live it at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Karen9:50 AM

    My view lines up pretty closely to yours. But I hesitate to call it a myth. I've heard from many couple friends that they fell in love at first sight, with that feeling accompanied by a sense of serendipity. While I think that feeling is attributable to the #3 (chemistry) you mentioned, the memory of that feeling and the idea of soul mates are sometimes necessary to get you through those times when your #2 (mutual commitment) is wavering.

    All that to say that I believe a soul mate is the mate you choose every moment, and who chooses you back. The motivations and reasons may vary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wendy10:36 AM

    Hey Beth,

    I *just* had this conversation today! I agree.

    Miss you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nadine4:12 PM

    Yep, we're twins.

    I concur on all counts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tim2:33 AM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:43 AM

    I think they're good thoughts! Although, for #3, I don't know if chemistry is actually a requirement up front. Perhaps it is still good even if it is developed/discovered later on during the relationship process.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Beth2:44 AM

    paulman - how "up front" do you mean? i would agree that it isn't every situation where an initial meeting has to have sparks flying if it's going to be something more...but i do believe that (for myself) if that chemistry isn't there within a couple of dates...chances are it never will be.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Katie V.11:53 AM

    Same. Basically. Not on the Jesus count but on the other points. I've been thinking about this quite a bit lately and I don't believe in just one soulmate. That doesn't mean we can't find someone who fits well with who we are and who we fit well with. Slash, I'm trying to listen to a lecture on voice disorders while I type this and I'm a terrible multi-tasker when both tasks involve language capacities.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Beth3:20 AM

    katie - do you think the common worldview is a rough equivalent of the Jesus factor? or is it less relevant/important?
    (also, your comment on multi-tasking made me laugh!)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sid S.2:15 PM

    i so thought u would have a mini-treatise on ur thoughts about it. i don't think that's long for an fb post. i've definitely written longer than that as a response to something. hahaha.

    i dunno what to think yet about this whole issue. the romantic in me wants the idea of one soul mate to "complete" me (a la Jerry Maguire).

    ReplyDelete
  11. Katie V.9:10 PM

    Yes, I can concede world view in lieu of Jesus. There definitely needs to be some common ground. Although I think world view is slightly less important as a nonchristian than relationship-with-Jesus is for a Christian. There is more room for leeway, in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The ROM, The Earth & Procreation

Disclaimer: This post is intended to generate discussion and a sharing of many opinions. It is NOT intended to judge or condemn anyone's life choices. I had an unexpected moment at the ROM last month. C and I were listening to a presentation for kids on wildlife conservation (or rather, I was listening, and C was eagerly anticipating what live animal would come out next), when a statement caught my attention and still hasn't let go. For most of history, the earth could provide enough resources for the earth's human population. But today, our population is growing rapidly, increasing by 250 000 people every day... Forty years from now, it will require 2 Earths to provide sustainably for our survival as a human species. But we only have 1 Earth. 250 000 people. Every day. That is roughly twice the size of my hometown. In one day. So I did a little math. (First, I rounded down to 200 000, just in case the figures were inflated or failed to account for some sort o...
27 comments
Read more

Women And Our Ways: Intro

Last summer, I started writing a blog entry that I never finished. There are several like that, actually. This particular one starts out: If you are male, you probably don't want to read this entry. I mean it. If you were grossed out by my entry on placenta lasagna , didn't understand the problematic tea commercial , or were surprised by my thoughts on the curse of Aunt Irma , this one is bigger, badder, and more bold. I'm going for broke. I've been meaning to write this girls-only series ever since. But then I realized that I want to write a series that may frighten or surprise men, but is not meant to exclude them. Then I thought that maybe I don't want to do that, as it will stir up controversy and I will be misunderstood and I will unintentionally offend both men and women and I will write about things that don't often get talked about. But I think I'm willing to risk it. Titles in the series Women and Our Ways may include: The Mo...
10 comments
Read more

Sunday Starters

I'm not sure if I'm going to keep up with a different 'theme' for blogging every day. Sometimes I like it, and sometimes I hate it. But what I do know is that Sundays are no longer Fundays. (well, in reality, I'm sure they still will be). Instead, I want to do this: I start a sentence, and we all fill it in. However we want. There is only one rule: You have to play the game too. Example: Happiness is... ...a warm puppy ...time with my family ...a myth ...knowing that in the end, he/she's got my back. ...impossible to pin down. This week's starter: When I was six, I thought...
14 comments
Read more